Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JUNE 2025

Supreme Court Decision In Seven County Advances Permitting Reform

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

In a much-anticipated decision, the U.S. Supreme Court made a major "course correction" to the law governing federal environmental reviews and permitting decisions for infrastructure and other projects...

United StatesEnvironment

In a much-anticipated decision, the U.S. Supreme Court made a major "course correction" to the law governing federal environmental reviews and permitting decisions for infrastructure and other projects under the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA"). SeeSeven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al. v. Eagle County Colorado, et al., No. 23-975 (May 29, 2025). The Court's unanimous decision in Seven County builds on the reasoning of the Supreme Court's last NEPA decision, Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen, 541 U.S. 752 (2004), and is in line with the bipartisan zeitgeist that the federal permitting process, like much of the nation's infrastructure, is itself in need of repair. In a decision meant to bring NEPA "back in line with the statutory text and common sense," the Court emphasized that "NEPA is a procedural cross-check, not a substantive roadblock. The goal of the law is to inform agency decisionmaking, not to paralyze it." Op. at 2, 13.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from