Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JULY 2022

Supreme Court's "Major Question Doctrine" Challenges Administrative Agencies

The Supreme Court has long been skeptical of novel proposals by federal agencies to address issues of vast economic and political significance.

United StatesEnvironment

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • The Supreme Court served notice to federal administrative agencies that novel new regulatory programs will need a "clear statement" of authorization from Congress.
  • The "major questions doctrine" provides a framework for federal courts to apply when interpreting statutes before granting Chevron
  • Regulated entities are certain to rely on the major questions doctrine in coming challenges to new regulations proposed by agencies across the Biden Administration—including not just the EPA, but the SEC, CFTC, OSHA, FERC, and others.

The Supreme Court has long been skeptical of novel proposals by federal agencies to address issues of vast economic and political significance. And this week, in West Virginia v. EPA, the Court made clear that its past cases reviewing novel applications and interpretations of agency powers do constitute an identifiable "doctrine" for application by courts going forward. When an administrative agency makes a "major policy

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from