Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 SEPTEMBER 2013

Standing Matters, TMDL Version

Judge Mark Wolf recently ruled that CLF did not have standing to challenge EPA’s approval of total maximum daily loads promulgated for certain waters in and around Cape Cod.

United StatesEnvironment

Last week, in Conservation Law Foundation v. EPA, Judge Mark Wolf ruled that CLF did not have standing to challenge EPA's approval of total maximum daily loads promulgated for certain waters in and around Cape Cod. Given the increasing number of citizen suits involving TMDL promulgation, the decision is important.

CLF asserted two claims. First, it alleged that EPA wrongly classified certain sources, including septic systems, storm water systems, and waste water treatment facilities as non-point sources, rather than point sources. Second, it alleged that the TMDLs failed to take into account the need for additional stringency due to the impacts of climate change.

With respect to the first claim, Judge Wolf concluded that the affidavits CLF submitted from two CLF members established injury in fact under Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife. However, he found that CLF had not established that the relief sought by CLF would redress its alleged injuries. Both

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from