Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MARCH 2025

San Francisco v. EPA: Impact On Clean Water Act Permittees

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

On Tuesday, March 4, the United States Supreme Court issued a major decision limiting the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA) as relates to permits governing discharges by industry and municipalities into covered water bodies.

United StatesEnvironment

I. Introduction

On Tuesday, March 4, the United States Supreme Court issued a major decision limiting the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA) as relates to permits governing discharges by industry and municipalities into covered water bodies.

Specifically, the 5-4 ruling in City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency held that EPA cannot enforce permit provisions that "make a permittee responsible for the quality of the water in the body of water into which the permittee discharges pollutants." No. 23-753, 2025 WL 676441, at *3 (U.S. Mar. 4, 2025). The Court ruled that under the CWA EPA cannot impose on discharging facilities the responsibility of achieving water quality results ("end-result" criteria) without providing specific direction on what permit holders can and cannot do, such as by imposing limits on each specific pollutant released by a facility. See id.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from