Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

VIDEO · 08 MAY 2017

Perhaps It Should Be Renamed The "Really, Really, Endangered Species Act" (Video)

The decision seems correct, but as the frustration of the Court reflects, it's only because the ESA is designed to fail.

United StatesEnvironment

Last Friday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a District Court decision ruling that the Fish & Wildlife Service decision that listing of the whitebark pine as endangered or threatened was "warranted, but precluded" was not arbitrary and capricious. The decision seems correct, but as the frustration of the Court reflects, it's only because the ESA is designed to fail.

The procedural history is lengthy and not really necessary to repeat here. Suffice it to say that the whitebark pine is both an important species and in significant distress, if not dire straits. In response to a listing petition, the FWS issued a finding that listing the whitebark pine is "warranted, but precluded." Thus, the FWS instead added the whitebark pine to the list of "candidate species."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from