Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JULY 2026

NAW v. Feldon: Bench Trial Day Two Summary (July 14, 2026)

The second day of the NAW v. Feldon bench trial examined how Oregon's Extended Producer Responsibility program affects interstate supply chains, with testimony focusing on producer identification challenges, packaging design requirements, fee calculation complexities, and regional distribution networks. Witnesses from wholesale distributors and industry representatives detailed the practical burdens of compliance, while Oregon argued many challenges stem from business decisions rather than statutory deficie

United StatesEnvironment

The second day of the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors (NAW) v. Feldon bench trial shifted from establishing the structure of Oregon’s Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) program to examining how Oregon’s Plastic Pollution and Recycling Modernization Act (RMA) potentially impacts interstate supply chains. Much of the day’s testimony focused on the practical challenges associated with producer identification, packaging design, fee calculation, and regional distribution networks. Through both fact and expert testimony, NAW continued building its factual record that Oregon’s implementation of the RMA affects business operations extending well beyond Oregon’s borders, while Oregon sought to demonstrate that many of the asserted burdens reflect business decisions or implementation issues rather than deficiencies in the statute itself.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from