Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

VIDEO · 08 APRIL 2025

Navigating Sites With PFAS Through The Superfund Process Is Going To Be A Bumpy Ride (Video)

For most of this century, I've been asked with some regularity whether Superfund was dead. I've always considered that question to be a victory of hope over expectation.

United StatesEnvironment

For most of this century, I've been asked with some regularity whether Superfund was dead. I've always considered that question to be a victory of hope over expectation. Notwithstanding frequent criticism, frequently deserved, Superfund refuses to go away. As I made clear in a post this past April, the developing awareness of the problems caused by PFAS has pretty much proved Mark Twain once more to be on point. The reports of the death of Superfund have been greatly exaggerated.

1608022a.jpg

All of this brings us to a report last week from Inside EPA (subscription required), which discussed EPA's use of the Five-Year Review process to require PRPs to investigate the potential presence of PFAS at Superfund sites. In the article, an industry attorney complained that such Five-Year Reviews are "fishing expeditions". I have some sympathy for this concern. If I may mix my metaphors, given the near omnipresence of PFAS, it's somewhat akin to a fishing expedition conducted in a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from