Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 NOVEMBER 2012

Further Confirmation Notice Of Exemption Filed Before Project Approval Is Void

Sheppard
Sheppard
Contributor
Sheppard

Sheppard

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more...

View firm profile
Explore more from Sheppard

The partially published opinion in Coalition for Clean Air v. City of Visalia brightened the line regarding when a California Environmental Quality Act Notice of Exemption (NOE) is valid.

United StatesEnvironment

Coalition for Clean Air v. City of Visalia (Oct. 4, 2012, No. F062983M)

The partially published opinion in Coalition for Clean Air v. City of Visalia brightened the line regarding when a California Environmental Quality Act Notice of Exemption (NOE) is valid. In a nutshell, the Fifth District Court of Appeal concluded that an NOE filed before the final approval of a proposed project is invalid and does not trigger the 35-day statute of limitations set forth in CEQA. This is not new law. However, it confirms the principle set forth in the recent California Supreme Court's Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of Stockton (2010) 48 Cal.4th 481 decision, which is that a petitioner has 35 days to challenge an NOE that is valid on its face.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from