Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 SEPTEMBER 2026

Fifth Circuit Vacates EPA's Methylene Chloride Risk Management Rule Under TSCA

The Fifth Circuit's landmark decision in East Fork Enterprises v. EPA vacates the agency's methylene chloride risk management rule, establishing new precedents for how TSCA requires condition-specific risk determinations, treatment of workplace protective equipment, and evidentiary standards. This ruling could fundamentally reshape EPA's approach to chemical regulation and influence pending litigation involving asbestos, trichloroethylene, and other substances.

United StatesEnvironment

Highlights

  • The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently vacated the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) methylene chloride risk management rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) in East Fork Enterprises, Inc. v. EPA, finding that errors of law occurred and substantial evidence did not support EPA's decision.
  • The court held that TSCA requires EPA to issue separate risk determinations for each condition of use of a chemical substance, rejecting EPA's "whole chemical" approach, and also found that EPA violated TSCA by assuming that workers do not use personal protective equipment when making determinations of unreasonable risk.
  • The court concluded that EPA's occupational exposure limits were not based on the best available science and that EPA regulated beyond the extent necessary to address unreasonable risk.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from