Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 AUGUST 2026

Federal Court Requests Supplemental Briefing In Oregon EPR Challenge

A federal district court has requested supplemental briefing on whether Oregon's Extended Producer Responsibility law contains a facially discriminatory exemption that violates the Dormant Commerce Clause. The court's narrow focus on this single statutory provision follows a five-day bench trial and post-trial briefings in the landmark challenge to Oregon's packaging EPR program. This case is expected to establish precedent that will influence the development and implementation of state packaging EPR progra

United StatesEnvironment

The federal district court presiding over National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors v. Feldon has issued a new scheduling order that provides insight into the next phase of the groundbreaking challenge against Oregon’s Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) law. Following a five-day bench trial in July and the parties’ post-trial briefings, filed on July 31, 2026, Judge Michael H. Simon concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Instead, the court has requested supplemental briefing on a single, discrete issue: whether the Oregon Plastic Pollution and Recycling Modernization Act’s (RMA) exemption for certain Oregon public bodies that qualify as “small producers” under Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 459A.863(32)(b) and ORS 459A.872(1) is facially discriminatory in violation of the Dormant Commerce Clause.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from