Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JULY 2026

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Packaging Law Update

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

Extended producer responsibility (EPR) packaging laws have moved from enactment into active implementation across seven U.S. states, with producer registration deadlines passing, compliance fees being collected, and enforcement actions beginning. As Oregon publishes its first noncompliant producer list and litigation challenges emerge in California, Oregon, and Colorado, companies selling packaged products face an increasingly complex landscape of state-specific obligations, fee structures, and legal uncert

United StatesEnvironment

When we last surveyed the extended producer responsibility (EPR) legal landscape for packaging, seven states had enacted comprehensive product stewardship programs, and the central thrust was preparation for the core obligations under those emerging regimes.1 Since our last update, those obligations have become increasingly concrete, as packaging EPR laws have moved beyond enactment and into implementation, enforcement, and, in some instances, litigation.

Across the states with enacted EPR programs, implementation is moving forward at different stages: permanent regulations have taken effect in certain states, producer registration and reporting deadlines have passed or are fast approaching, and the first producer compliance fees have become due in Oregon and Colorado.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from