Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 NOVEMBER 2016

EPA Moves For Summary Judgment In Murray Energy's "Coal Jobs" Lawsuit

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

On May 2, 2016, EPA filed a motion for summary judgment, urging the court to immediately conclude the case and avoid trial, which was scheduled to begin on July 19, 2016, but was postponed by the court.

United StatesEnvironment

As first reported in the Spring 2015 issue of The Climate Report, in March 2014, Murray Energy Corp. ("Murray Energy") and 11 of its subsidiaries sued EPA in the Northern District of West Virginia federal court, alleging that EPA ignored its obligation to consider the consequences of Clean Air Act ("CAA") regulations on job losses and displacements in the coal industry. Murray Energy Corporation et al. v. Administrator of EPA, No. 5:14-cv-00039. In its complaint, Murray Energy proclaimed EPA's administration and enforcement of the CAA as a "War on Coal" that was "causing coal mines to close, costing hard-working Americans their jobs, and shifting employment away from areas rich in coal resources to areas with energy resources preferred by [EPA]." Murray Energy argued that EPA failed to comply with Section 321(a) of the CAA, which requires the EPA Administrator to "conduct continuing evaluations of potential loss or shifts of employment which may result from the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from