Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JUNE 2014

EPA Directive Found To Violate Its Own Regional Consistency Regulations

A panel of the D.C. Circuit vacated EPA's Summit Directive imposed different regulatory requirements in one region of the country than those in force elsewhere.

United StatesEnvironment

Jessica Farmer is an Associate in the Washington D.C. office.

A panel of the D.C. Circuit vacated EPA's Summit Directive--a directive which, in response to an unfavorable decision, imposed different regulatory requirements in one region of the country than those in force elsewhere.  The Court found that the directive violated EPA's regional consistency regulations.

EPA's regulations, in connection with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, state that multiple pollutant-emitting activities are considered to be a single stationary source if they are "adjacent." In applying these regulations, EPA has stated that determinations as to whether two or more facilities are "adjacent" should be based on the functional interrelationships of the facilities, not just the physical distance.  This functional interrelationship theory was challenged, and in August of 2012, in Summit Petroleum Corp. v. EPA, the Sixth Circuit held that EPA's broad definition of the term

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from