Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JANUARY 2014

D.C. Circuit Grants Rehearing In Clean Air Act Case

BakerHostetler
BakerHostetler
Contributor
BakerHostetler

BakerHostetler

Recognized as an innovator and one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler helps...

View firm profile
Explore more from BakerHostetler

On December 11, a D.C. Circuit panel (Tatel, Brown, Griffith) granted in part environmental and state petitions for rehearing in Mississippi v. EPA (Nos. 08-1200 et al.), revising key language describing the court’s review of certain agency actions.

United StatesEnvironment

On December 11, a D.C. Circuit panel (Tatel, Brown, Griffith) granted in part environmental and state petitions for rehearing in Mississippi v. EPA (Nos. 08-1200 et al.), revising key language describing the court's review of certain agency actions.  In July, the panel affirmed EPA's 2008 revisions to the primary ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards ("NAAQS"), while remanding the revised secondary ozone NAAQS for reconsideration.  EPA set both the primary and secondary standards at the same level: 0.075 ppm (parts per million), revised downward from the 1997 level of 0.08 ppm.

Under Clean Air Act Section 109(b)(1), primary NAAQS set pollution levels that "allow[] an adequate margin of safety . . . requisite to protect the public health"; secondary NAAQS under Section 109(b)(2) set levels "requisite to protect the public welfare."  The court's July opinion rejected arguments that EPA had improperly disregarded a recommendation from the Clean Air Science

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from