Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MARCH 2016

CSAPR > BART: The Eighth Circuit Affirms Minnesota's Regional Haze Plan

On Monday, the 8th Circuit agreed that EPA's decision that the Transport Rule is better than BART was not arbitrary or capricious.

United StatesEnvironment

Environmental lawyers live for acronyms.  Why is CSAPR > BART?  Because EPA determined that, on net, EPA's Transport Rule is "better than BART," meaning that compliance with the Transport Rule yields greater progress towards attaining EPA's regional haze goals than would application of best available retrofit technologies to those sources that would otherwise be subject to BART.  On Monday, the 8th Circuit agreed that EPA's decision that the Transport Rule is better than BART was not arbitrary or capricious.

The opinion breaks no new ground, but does provide a useful reminder of the courts' limited role in these cases:

Maybe time will prove [petitioner] right on some of these fronts; maybe not.  But arbitrary and capricious review does not ask who is right. It asks whether the EPA followed a defensible process in assessing who is right.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from