Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JANUARY 2011

Court Questions Use of "Modified" Baseline Approach in Transportation Improvement EIR

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

The City of Sunnyvale failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) when it analyzed the potential impacts of a major street extension by comparing them to traffic, noise, and air conditions that were projected to exist without the street extension in 2020 (the expected completion date for the project), ruled the California Court of Appeal, Sixth District in a recent decision.

United StatesEnvironment

The City of Sunnyvale failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) when it analyzed the potential impacts of a major street extension by comparing them to traffic, noise, and air conditions that were projected to exist without the street extension in 2020 (the expected completion date for the project), ruled the California Court of Appeal, Sixth District in a recent decision. The court's decision, Sunnyvale West Neighborhood Association v. City of Sunnyvale City Council, concluded that under the facts of the case, the use of such a future or "modified" baseline approach to assess the project's impacts did not fulfill CEQA's requirement that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) determine whether a project would significantly impact the existing environment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from