Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MAY 2014

CERCLA’s Statutory Liability Defenses — How Strict Is CERCLA Liability?

The Second Circuit in In re September 11 Litigation affirmed that contamination caused by the 9/11 attacks was within CERCLA’s "Act of War" defense.

United StatesEnvironment

It was no surprise that the Second Circuit in In re September 11 Litigation  recently affirmed the lower court's ruling that contamination caused by the 9/11 attacks was within CERCLA's "Act of War" defense.  Although CERCLA is often said to impose strict liability regardless of fault, the Second Circuit's decision indicates that CERCLA's liability scheme was not intended to reach contamination that was caused entirely by the hostile acts of others:

The attacks wrested from the defendants all control over the planes and the buildings, obviated any precautions or prudent measures defendants might have taken to prevent contamination, and located sole responsibility for the event and the environmental consequences on fanatics whose acts the defendants were not bound by CERCLA to anticipate or prevent. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from