Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 DECEMBER 2024

Beyond Chevron: Courts vs. Agencies In A New Era

Greenberg Glusker LLP
Greenberg Glusker LLP
Contributor
Greenberg Glusker LLP

Greenberg Glusker LLP

Overview Greenberg Glusker is a full-service law firm in Los Angeles, California with clients that...

View firm profile
Explore more from Greenberg Glusker LLP

The legal landscape regarding federal agency authority fundamentally changed in 2024 with the Supreme Court's decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. This landmark case dismantles the Chevron deference standard...

United StatesEnvironment

Examining the Implications of the Supreme Court's Shift on Chevron Deference

The legal landscape regarding federal agency authority fundamentally changed in 2024 with the Supreme Court's decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. This landmark case dismantles the Chevron deference standard, reshaping the balance of power between courts and agencies. To fully appreciate the implications of this decision, it is crucial to understand the historical context of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984) and how judicial deference has evolved over the past 40 years.

The Background of Chevron Deference

In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. that courts should defer to an agency's interpretation of ambiguous statutes, provided the interpretation was reasonable. This case arose from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) interpretation of the Clean Air Act, specifically

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from