Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JULY 2020

Air Emissions Ruling Undermines EPA Guidance On CERCLA

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

A recent decision by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Clean Air Council v. U.S. Steel Corp., held that emissions from a Clean Air Act Title V-permitted

United StatesEnvironment

A recent decision by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Clean Air Council v. U.S. Steel Corp., held that emissions from a Clean Air Act Title V-permitted facility that were not compliant with the facility's permit were nonetheless federally permitted releases that were exempt from reporting provisions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, or CERCLA, also known as the Superfund law. 1

This decision ran contrary to long-standing U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidance and administrative law decisions, which held that only compliant emissions could take advantage of the federally permitted release exemption. If adopted more broadly, this ruling could have significant impacts, exempting a group of previously regulated emissions from CERCLA reporting and even liability requirements.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from