Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JULY 2021

A Drop In The PFAS Response Bucket

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Massachusetts was one of the first states in the union to set "protective" levels.

United StatesEnvironment

Kudos to the Baker-Polito Administration for getting $3 million in state aid to 17 communities struggling to figure out what to do about the detection in their public water supplies of the "forever chemicals" known as PFAS at concentrations higher than what DEP has determined to be "protective".   

Massachusetts was one of the first states in the union to set "protective" levels.  The Federal Government and most States still have not done so.  Of course $3 million is a tiny fraction of what will be necessary to treat drinking water in these communities and the countless others that have not yet determined that they are in the same boat.  In the meantime tens of thousands of residents of the Commonwealth have come to fear their drinking water.  Many of those who can afford to do so are now buying bottled water. More will continue to live in fear of this basic necessity for the months if not years it will take to design and implement the additional treatment to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from