Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 DECEMBER 2020

Latest Decision From FERC Highlights Potential For State Action On Resource Adequacy

A new entrant is exempt under Part B if the forecasted capacity prices in the first three years of operation are higher than the net Cost of New Entry (CONE) of the new resource.

United StatesEnergy and Natural Resources
Daniel Spitzer
Daniel Spitzer

Late in the eve before the Labor Day weekend, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") rejected changes proposed by the New York Independent System Operator ("NYISO") to improve its buyer-side mitigation ("BSM") rules. 1 The proposed improvements to the so-called "Part A" and "Part B" tests would have made it easier for resources receiving direct incentives and related state support – such as wind, solar, and battery storage – to pass those tests and avoid the price floor requirements in the capacity market. The changes were recommended not only by the NYISO's Market Monitor but were easily approved by a supermajority of NYISO stakeholders, even including generator groups that have consistently supported the FERC's recent slew of BSM orders.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from