Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MAY 2012

Workplace Harassment Based On Sexual Orientation Actionable In Connecticut

The Connecticut Supreme Court recently ruled that employers can be held liable for failing to protect employees from harassment based on sexual orientation.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Originally published on the Employer's Law Blog

The Connecticut Supreme Court recently ruled that employers can be held liable for failing to protect employees from harassment based on sexual orientation.

In Patino v. Birken Manufacturing Company, a former Birken Manufacturing employee brought suit alleging the company failed to take reasonable steps to prevent his coworkers from harassing him based on his sexual orientation. Plaintiff Luis Patino alleged that he was the subject of anti-gay slurs for years while working as a machinist for Birken.

Connecticut's highest court rejected the defendant's argument that hostile work environment claims are limited to sexual harassment claims. Instead, the court held that employees can recover under state law when discrimination based on sexual orientation has created a hostile or abusive work environment. The court noted that Connecticut law protects victims of sexual orientation discrimination to the same extent it

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from