Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 DECEMBER 2025

Top Five Labor Law Developments For November 2025

Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Contributor
Jackson Lewis P.C.

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Focused on labor and employment law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.’s 950+ attorneys located in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Jackson Lewis P.C.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that Congress may not constitutionally restrict the president's ability to remove members of the National Labor Relations Board without cause.

United StatesEmployment and HR
  1. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that Congress may not constitutionally restrict the president's ability to remove members of the National Labor Relations Board without cause. Wilcox v. Trump, et al., No. 25-5057 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 5, 2025). The court reversed district court rulings that had reinstated Board Member Gwynne Wilcox under statutory for-cause removal protections, finding those protections invalid under Article II of the U.S. Constitution. Relying on the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in Myers and Seila Law, the court concluded the Board wields "substantial executive power" through rulemaking, policymaking adjudications, remedial authority, and litigation, placing it outside the narrow exception recognized in Humphrey's Executor for agencies exercising only quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial functions. The panel emphasized that these powers exceed those of the Federal Trade Commission in 1935 when Humphrey's Executor was decided and,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from