Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JULY 2022

This Week At The Ninth: Class Certification And Misclassification

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

This week, the Court takes a close look at the standards for certifying a class action under Rule 23 and for classifying someone as an employee or independent contractor under California law.

United StatesEmployment and HR

This week, the Court takes a close look at the standards for certifying a class action under Rule 23 and for classifying someone as an employee or independent contractor under California law.

BOWERMAN v. FIELD ASSET SERVICES, INC.

The Court holds that variations in injury and damages precluded class certification for plaintiffs' overtime and reimbursement claims, while clarifying the standards applicable in determining whether an individual is an employee or independent contractor in California.

The panel: Judges W. Fletcher, Bennett, and Bade, with Judge Bennett writing the opinion.

Key highlight: "[B]ecause the class members have not necessarily suffered damages traceable to their alleged misclassification, and because they have not presented a method of calculating damages that is not excessively difficult, they have failed to satisfy Comcast's simple command that the case be 'susceptible to awarding damages on a class-wide basis.'"

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from