Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MAY 2016

The Right To Withdraw Recognition Is Under Attack

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

For over 65 years, an employer has had a legal right to withdraw recognition from an incumbent union based on the union's lack of majority status.

United StatesEmployment and HR

For over 65 years, an employer has had a legal right to withdraw recognition from an incumbent union based on the union's lack of majority status. In 1951, in Celanese, the NLRB permitted withdrawal based on the employer's "good faith belief" for the lack of majority status. In 2001, in Levitz Furniture, the standard was changed to require "objective evidence" to exercise the right to withdraw.

Often overlooked by the holding in Levitz Furniture was the fact that the then General Counsel sought to eliminate the right to withdraw recognition unless there was an RM or RD election to determine majority status. That dramatic change in the long-standing precedent was rejected by the NLRB in Levitz Furniture.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from