Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MAY 2019

Supreme Court Reiterates That Class Arbitration Cannot Be Compelled Absent Explicit Consent

The U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in Lamps Plus, Inc., et al. v. Varela, No. 17-988, on April 24, 2019.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Tina Tellado is a Partner in our Los Angeles office.

Deisy Castro is an Associate or Partner in our Los Angeles office.

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • The U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in Lamps Plus, Inc., et al. v. Varela, on April 24, 2019, holding in a 5-4 decision that courts may not infer from an ambiguous arbitration agreement that parties have consented to class arbitration.
  • The Supreme Court's ruling overturns a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's decision permitting a Lamps Plus employee to pursue class arbitration of his data breach class claims.
  • With this most recent decision in Lamps Plus, the Supreme Court appears to have put the final nail in the plaintiffs' bar ability to evade employers' arbitration agreements foreclosing class action claims.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from