Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 DECEMBER 2022

S.D.N.Y. Voids ERISA Plan's Arbitration Provision

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

A district court in New York recently refused to enforce an arbitration provision in an ERISA fiduciary breach lawsuit challenging the valuation of an Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP").

United StatesEmployment and HR

A district court in New York recently refused to enforce an arbitration provision in an ERISA fiduciary breach lawsuit challenging the valuation of an Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP"). The ruling in Lloyd v. Argent, No. 22-cv-4129, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219964 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2022), exposes the continued uncertainty as to the enforceability of arbitration provisions when applied to ERISA fiduciary breach claims.

Plaintiffs in the case were former employees and participants in the defendants' ESOP. They alleged that, in 2016, defendants caused the ESOP to purchase shares of the employer's stock at an inflated price. In the years following the acquisition, the stock price plummeted for reasons plaintiffs state were foreseeable at the time of the acquisition. Defendants moved to dismiss on various grounds, and also to compel arbitration, based on arbitration provisions contained in the plan document. Among other things, the arbitration provisions disallowed

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from