Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 NOVEMBER 2025

OneTaste Incorporated v. Netflix, Inc.

Loeb & Loeb LLP
Loeb & Loeb LLP
Contributor
Loeb & Loeb LLP

Loeb & Loeb LLP

Loeb & Loeb LLP is a multi-service law firm with more than 400 lawyers focusing on select core...

View firm profile
Explore more from Loeb & Loeb LLP

In defamation action brought against Netflix based on documentary stating that plaintiff was involved in the sexual assault and abuse of a former employee...

United StatesEmployment and HR

In defamation action brought against Netflix based on documentary stating that plaintiff was involved in the sexual assault and abuse of a former employee, California appeals court affirms striking of complaint because plaintiff failed to demonstrate probability of prevailing on element of actual malice.

Plaintiff OneTaste Incorporated is a wellness company that promoted a sexual practice called “orgasmic meditation” (OM). OneTaste opened locations across the United States focused on OM, including residences where OM participants lived together. Beginning in 2018, several news organizations and media outlets published stories describing OneTaste as a “kind of prostitution ring” in which employees, staffers and community members were sexually exploited. Several publications referenced the allegations of Ayries Blanck, a former employee to whom OneTaste had paid $325,000 to settle her claim that she had been ordered to sleep with customers and managers.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from