Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 NOVEMBER 2015

Ninth Circuit Won't Review Uber Driver Class Certification Decision

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

The sharing or gig economy has introduced a new management paradigm for companies, more flexible schedules for workers, and a greater level of convenience and accountability to consumers.

United StatesEmployment and HR

The sharing or gig economy has introduced a new management paradigm for companies, more flexible schedules for workers, and a greater level of convenience and accountability to consumers.  While there are many supporters of this new economy, the individuals providing the services are caught in an undefined space – are they employees or independent contractors?

O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. is an important (and believed to be the leading) case that aims to answer that question.  But before doing so, the court – located in the Northern District of California – first had to determine whether the case could proceed as a class action; that is, whether "the drivers' working relationships with Uber [are] sufficiently similar" such that if Uber did misclassify the working relationship, it could be held liable as to each of its drivers.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from