Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 DECEMBER 2016

New Rules For Nevada Noncompetes

Dickinson Wright PLLC
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Contributor
Dickinson Wright PLLC

Dickinson Wright PLLC

Dickinson Wright is a full-service law firm with more than 550 lawyers, serving clients across the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dickinson Wright PLLC

The Nevada Supreme Court recently has injected substantial uncertainty into any Nevada contract that contains a noncompete agreement, and companies need to conduct a careful review of any contract that contains a noncompete . . .

United StatesEmployment and HR

Nevada Companies Must Review Their Noncompete Agreements

The Nevada Supreme Court recently has injected substantial uncertainty into any Nevada contract that contains a noncompete agreement, and companies need to conduct a careful review of any contract that contains a noncompete to ensure that those contracts remain enforceable under the new rules.

In short, the Nevada Supreme Court has held that if a noncompete agreement is determined by a Nevada court to be unreasonable in any way, the court will not reform or modify the noncompete agreement, but will instead find it wholly unenforceable. Because of this rule, the bottom line for companies is that they must review any of their contracts that contain a noncompete agreement to determine whether the contract remains enforceable. This advice applies most directly to employment contracts, but other contracts such as assets purchase agreements, severance agreements, and settlement agreements may be affected as well.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from