Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 DECEMBER 2016

National Labor Relations Board Issues Yet Another Decision Finding An Employer's Work Rules Overly Broad

Sheppard
Sheppard
Contributor
Sheppard

Sheppard

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more...

View firm profile
Explore more from Sheppard

The National Labor Relations Board ("Board") recently issued a decision that serves as a reminder for both union and non-union employers that the Board continues to take an aggressive stance on...

United StatesEmployment and HR

The National Labor Relations Board ("Board") recently issued a decision that serves as a reminder for both union and non-union employers that the Board continues to take an aggressive stance on seemingly innocuous employment policies that the Board believes may chill an employee's exercise of his or her Section 7 rights under the National Labor Relations Act (the "Act").

The Employer in Component Bar Products, Inc., 364 NLRB No. 140 (Nov. 8, 2016), maintained a personal conduct and disciplinary action policy that prohibited, among other things: (1) insubordination or other disrespectful conduct; and (2) boisterous or disruptive activity in the workplace. The Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ"), applying the test set out in Lutheran Heritage Village-Livonia, 343 NLRB 646 (2004), found that these work rules were facially unlawful because employees would reasonably construe these rules to prohibit the exercise of their Section 7 rights under the Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from