Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 FEBRUARY 2007

Microinequities: Should Employers "Sweat The Small Stuff"?

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Microinequities are the subtle putdowns, snubs, dismissive gestures, or sarcastic tones that can undercut employee performance and encourage employee turnover. Articles in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Time Magazine, among other publications, evidence the growing concern of corporations across the country about the impact of microinequities on employee morale, productivity, and attrition.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Microinequities are the subtle putdowns, snubs, dismissive gestures, or sarcastic tones that can undercut employee performance and encourage employee turnover.1 Articles in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Time Magazine, among other publications, evidence the growing concern of corporations across the country about the impact of microinequities on employee morale, productivity, and attrition. Recent court rulings call into question whether employers should fear that the latest HR buzzword 2 – microinequities – will become a source of labor law liability for employers. Put another way: Should employers "sweat the small stuff"?

In June 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court held in the case of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White that unlawful retaliation under Title VII may include actions that would not necessarily constitute discrimination. 3 Specifically, the Court ruled that an employee need not prove that he or she was subjected to a reduction in pay,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from