Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 APRIL 2013

Keep Your Hands Off Our Clients

A discussion on how an employer's non-compete clause can be held to be unreasonable restraints of the trade.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Stopco's President is adamant that a departing Stopco employee doesn't take any of Stopco's clients. So Stopco's President came up with a nice, broad non-compete which he made all employees sign upon employment with Stopco. Stopco's non-compete provides:

Employee shall not ... directly or indirectly solicit, accept business from, perform services for or disclose Stopco's confidential information to any individual or entity that Stopco provided products/services for during the period of Employee's employment with Stopco ... regardless of whether Employee dealt with or performed any function for the individual or entity during Employee's employment with Stopco.

Stopco's President figured his non-compete would do the trick, but he figured wrong. A recent Texas Court of Appeals panel held that a non-compete clause similar to Stopco's clause was overbroad and constituted an unreasonable restraint of trade. The Court held a business's non-compete must not only be

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from