Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MAY 2010

JustMed, Inc. v. Byce: A Tech Upset

For early stage technology companies the definitions of independent contractor and employee for determining copyright ownership may have changed.

United StatesEmployment and HR

For early stage technology companies the definitions of independent contractor and employee for determining copyright ownership may have changed. In a case that could alter the landscape as to who is considered an employee when it comes to "work for hire" and copyright ownership in the world of technology based start-ups, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit relaxed the rules on who is considered an employee versus an independent contractor for the purposes of considering where work is considered a "work for hire." In JustMed, Inc. v. Byce, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 6976 (9th Cir. Apr. 5, 2010), the Ninth Circuit was asked to decide whether JustMed, Inc., a small technology start-up company, or Michael Byce, a software developer working remotely, owned the source code that Byce engineered while working for JustMed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from