Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JULY 2014

IRCA Does Not Preempt FEHA, But Limits Available Remedies

In April of 2003, Vicente Salas used a false Social Security Number to obtain employment with Sierra Chemical, a manufacturer and distributor of chemicals.

United StatesEmployment and HR

In Salas v. Sierra Chemical Co., the California Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the federal Immigration Reform and Control Act ("IRCA") preempts the application of the antidiscrimination provisions of California's Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA")—which protect California workers "regardless of immigration status." The Court concluded that IRCA does not preempt FEHA, but does preclude an award of lost pay damages for any period of time after the employer discovers the employee's ineligibility to work in the United States.

In April of 2003, Vicente Salas used a false Social Security Number to obtain employment with Sierra Chemical, a manufacturer and distributor of chemicals for treating water in swimming pools. On two separate occasions, in March and August of 2006, Salas injured his back while stacking crates, and performed modified duties until a seasonal lay off in December of 2006. In May of 2007, Salas' supervisor informed Salas that he could

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from