Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 FEBRUARY 2015

Failure To Send Pre-Adverse Action Notice Sinks Defendant’s Summary Judgment Motion

In May 2011, Plaintiff applied for employment with Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Pharmaceuticals and received an offer of employment on June 28, 2011.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Miller v. Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Yale Associates, Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4448 (M.D. Fl. Jan. 14, 2015)

Facts:

In May 2011, Plaintiff applied for employment with Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Pharmaceuticals (collectively "J&J") and received an offer of employment on June 28, 2011. That offer was contingent on Plaintiff's successful completion of a background check. Yale, a background check company, conducted the background check and notified J&J of the results on July 6, 2011. Based on the report, J&J flagged Plaintiff's application for further review and by July 12, 2011, had formally rescinded his offer of employment due to the information contained in the background report. J&J never sent a pre-adverse action letter to Plaintiff. Plaintiff then filed suit alleging that Defendants violated the FCRA by failing to provide him with a pre-adverse action disclosure and a pre-adverse action opportunity to dispute the accuracy of the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from