Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 OCTOBER 2007

Eleventh Circuit Issues Important Decision On 401(k) Fee Litigation Case Dismissed

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

On June 21, 2007, in one of the first cases to address whether ERISA requires the disclosure of fees paid to 401(k) service providers, the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin dismissed plaintiffs’ claims that the fiduciaries of a 401(k) plan sponsored by Deere & Company ("Deere") violated their fiduciary duties under ERISA by failing to disclose revenue-sharing fee arrangements to participants.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Originally published July 2007

On June 21, 2007, in one of the first cases to address whether ERISA requires the disclosure of fees paid to 401(k) service providers, the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin dismissed plaintiffs’ claims that the fiduciaries of a 401(k) plan sponsored by Deere & Company ("Deere") violated their fiduciary duties under ERISA by failing to disclose revenue-sharing fee arrangements to participants. Hecker v. Deere & Co., 06-C-719-S, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45275 (W.D. Wis. June 21, 2007). Significantly, the Court ruled that as currently drafted, neither ERISA nor the regulations promulgated thereunder require plan sponsors to disclose revenue-sharing arrangements. Id. at *11-14. The court also dismissed plaintiffs’ claim that defendants breached their fiduciary duties by selecting funds that charged allegedly excessive fees to participants.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from