Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 NOVEMBER 2020

COBRA Litigation – 2020's Latest Gift

The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act ("COBRA") became law on April 7, 1986. For most of its nearly 35-year history, litigation involving COBRA has been relatively quiet.

United StatesEmployment and HR

The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act ("COBRA") became law on April 7, 1986. For most of its nearly 35-year history, litigation involving COBRA has been relatively quiet. Most COBRA claims are tag-alongs, added as an afterthought to various sorts of discrimination claims, and a few cases involving the definition of "gross misconduct" (essentially the one narrow exception where an offer of COBRA coverage is not required).

In the wake of the pandemic, this is changing. Recently, there have been a number of cases filed (most filed as class actions) involving largely technical violations of COBRA's notice rules.

Most of the suits have originated in Florida, but at least one is from New York. These cases each involve a former employee that did not elect COBRA continuation coverage upon his/her termination of employment. Each of the suits alleges that the COBRA notices provided by the employers to the plaintiffs were deficient in some respect. As a result

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from