Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2012

Attendance May Be An Essential Function Of The Job

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

This case tests the limits of an employer’s attendance policy. Just how essential is showing up for work on a predictable basis? In the case of a neo-natal intensive care nurse, we conclude that attendance really "is" essential.

United StatesEmployment and HR

This case tests the limits of an employer's attendance policy. Just how essential is showing up for work on a predictable basis? In the case of a neo-natal intensive care nurse, we conclude that attendance really is essential. 

So begins the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Samper v. Providence St. Vincent Medical Center.

The Samper plaintiff, a neonatal nurse in the defendant-hospital's Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), suffered from fibromyalgia which, she claimed, limited her sleep and caused her chronic pain.  The nurse asked the hospital to accommodate this disability by allowing her to miss work whenever she was having a "bad day."  After years of unacceptable absenteeism what the Court described as the hospital's "Herculean efforts" to accommodate the plaintiff, she was terminated.  She sued the hospital, claiming that it failed to provide her with a reasonable accommodation for her disability. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from