Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 FEBRUARY 2015

Appellate Division Panel Issues Ruling Broadly Interpreting New York State Human Rights Law

Sheppard
Sheppard
Contributor
Sheppard

Sheppard

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more...

View firm profile
Explore more from Sheppard

On January 14, 2015, the New York Supreme Court held that an employee can sufficiently demonstrate his membership in a protected class by virtue of his association with another person – in this case, his wife.

United StatesEmployment and HR

On January 14, 2015, in a case of first impression, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department held that an employee can sufficiently demonstrate his membership in a protected class by virtue of his association with another person – in this case, his wife.  In Jeffrey Chiara v. Town of New Castle, 2015 Slip Op. 00326 (2d Dep't Jan. 14, 2015), the Second Department held that Chiara could show he was discriminated against by the Town of New Castle based on religion as a result of his marriage to a Jewish person, even though he was not Jewish himself.  In so holding, the Second Department reversed the lower court's grant of summary judgment to the Town with respect to Chiara's claim that he was subject to religious discrimination when he was terminated.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from