Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 SEPTEMBER 2017

White Collar Roundup - September 2017

In United States v. Krug, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit made it a bit easier to pierce the attorney-client privilege when multiple defendants have a joint-defense agreement (JDA).

United StatesCriminal Law

Limiting the Scope of Joint-Defense Agreements

In United States v. Krug, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit made it a bit easier to pierce the attorney-client privilege when multiple defendants have a joint-defense agreement (JDA). In the case, co-defendants Raymond Krug, Gregory Kwiatkowski and Joseph Wendel, officers of the Buffalo Police Department, were charged with offenses based on the alleged use of excessive force during the arrest of four individuals. The three co-defendants entered into a JDA in which their defense counsel "participated in meetings together, transmitted emails, and shared legal memoranda and research." While the parties were covered by the JDA, Krug and Kwiatkowski had discussions in a hallway in the courthouse when their attorneys were not present. As trial approached, Kwiatkowski began to cooperate with the government and shared in a proffer session the statements Krug made during the hallway conversation. The government

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from