Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JULY 2019

In Recent "Original Source" Decision, Relator's Pre-2010 "Secondhand" Claims Back-Handed By Third Circuit

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

A recent Third Circuit decision reaffirmed the high bar a relator must meet to qualify as an "original source" under the pre-2010 version of the False Claims Act's (FCA) public disclosure bar.

United StatesCriminal Law

A recent Third Circuit decision reaffirmed the high bar a relator must meet to qualify as an "original source" under the pre-2010 version of the False Claims Act's (FCA) public disclosure bar. Before the 2010 amendments to the FCA, the statute defined "original source" to require that relators have "direct" (i.e., firsthand) and independent knowledge of the information underpinning their claims. In 2010, Congress expanded the original source exception to include instances where the relator "materially adds to the publicly disclosed allegations," even if the relator did not directly obtain the information at issue. Importantly, the 2010 amendment does not apply retroactively, meaning that, in cases involving pre-2010 conduct, relators still must meet the "firsthand knowledge" standard to qualify as an original source.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from