Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MAY 2015

6 Key Considerations Relating To Government Intervention In False Claims Cases

A significant number of cases that are brought under the False Claims Act are brought by qui tam relators (whistleblowers) who bring claims seeking relief on behalf of the Government.

United StatesCriminal Law

A significant number of cases that are brought under the False Claims Act are brought by qui tam relators (whistleblowers) who bring claims seeking relief on behalf of the Government. The number of whistleblower cases that are filed annually has nearly doubled between 2008 and 2014.

The Government has a right to review and decide whether to intervene in – effectively, take over – False Claims cases cases that are brought by whistleblowers. The Government intervention decision represents a critical stage in any False Claims litigation. The Government has typically intervened in less than 25% of qui tam cases that are filed, but the rapidly growing number of qui tam filings means that the Government is intervening in nearly twice as many cases as it was 7 years ago.   The Government intervention decision is particularly important because, while the Government intervenes in less than 1 out of every 4 cases, the Government obtains more than 90% of its total False Claims

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from