On Nov. 30, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
published a potential watershed decision in U.S. v.
Banks,1 holding for the first time that the
definition of "loss" in fraud cases does not include
"intended" loss under the sentencing guidelines.
Thus, the government may only use evidence of "actual"
loss to establish an appropriate punishment for fraudulent conduct
— a huge win for defendants that could have massive
ramifications in white collar cases going forward.
Prosecutors exploit "intended loss" in order to
manufacture higher sentences in white collar matters, a tool that
has been greatly questioned and diminished. The Banks decision is a
fatal blow to this unwieldy analysis, which may result in fewer
white collar matters and smaller sentences.