Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 AUGUST 2010

Using Contingent Consideration to Bridge the Value Gap

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

By almost any measure, M&A activity is decidedly up over the abysmal levels of a year ago. According to FactSet Mergerstat, in the first half of 2010, 2,696 transactions were announced involving a U.S. buyer or target, as compared to 2,129 in the same period of 2009.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

By almost any measure, M&A activity is decidedly up over the abysmal levels of a year ago. According to FactSet Mergerstat, in the first half of 2010, 2,696 transactions were announced involving a U.S. buyer or target, as compared to 2,129 in the same period of 2009. Nevertheless, it is also the case that many strategically sensible transactions are still not getting done because of the inability of the seller and buyer to agree on price. In some cases, sellers see significant upside in the future trajectory of the business, while buyers may be unwilling to pay for that upside given the perceived risks in achieving it.

In several recent transactions, the parties have successfully bridged this value gap by using contingent consideration. Most recently, on June 30, 2010, Celgene Corporation announced that it had agreed to acquire Abraxis BioScience Inc. in a deal valued at $2.9 billion. In addition to the cash and stock consideration of $58.00 in cash and 0.2617 shares

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from