Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MARCH 2017

Take It Or Leave It

Butler Snow LLP
Butler Snow LLP
Contributor
Butler Snow LLP

Butler Snow LLP

Some law firms promise client service. Butler Snow delivers on that promise. Surveys by respected...

View firm profile
Explore more from Butler Snow LLP

The Tennessee Court of Appeals recently found that a "take or leave it offer" extended by a lender to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty was not duress.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

The Tennessee Court of Appeals recently found that a "take or leave it offer" extended by a lender to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty was not duress.  SK Food Corp., et al. v. FirstBank, No. M2016-01019-COA-R3-CV, 2017 WL 776116 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 28, 2017).

Borrowers met with Lender about refinancing an existing loan with Lender. Id. at *1.  The parties executed a commitment letter specifying that the lender's security interest would be a "first lien deed of trust" and requiring a nonrefundable commitment fee from borrowers. Id.  The loan ultimately did not close due to an existing lien on the security pledged by the Borrowers. Id. The Borrowers filed suit, seeking return of the commitment fee. Id.  The Borrowers alleged, in part, that the commitment fee should be returned because the commitment letter was executed under duress. Id. at *3.  The trial court granted summary judgment for the Lender.  Id.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from