Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 AUGUST 2012

Section 3(b)(2) Offerings As IPOs

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

We hope that the SEC engages actively with the securities exchanges to facilitate the listing of securities of issuers concurrently with the pricing of their Regulation A+ (a/k/a 3(b)(2)) offerings.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

We hope that the SEC engages actively with the securities exchanges to facilitate the listing of securities of issuers concurrently with the pricing of their Regulation A+ (a/k/a 3(b)(2)) offerings. The JOBS Act seems to contemplate that some issuers will pursue Regulation A+ offerings, not seek exchange listings and choose to remain non-reporting companies. However, the Act also contemplates that an issuer might conduct a Regulation A+ and concurrently list its securities on a national securities exchange. In fact, one of the paths to preemption depends on a concurrent exchange listing. So, how will this accomplished? The current approach would seem impractical. Now, an issuer would have to file a registration statement on Form 10 (in addition to having prepared, filed and had reviewed an offering statement for the Regulation A+ offering). That is duplicative and costly. Exchange listings in connection with Regulation A+ offerings will, in almost all instances,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from