Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 DECEMBER 2015

SEC: Confidentiality Agreements Cannot Impede Whistleblowers

Fox Rothschild LLP
Fox Rothschild LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Fox Rothschild LLP

Thus, corporate counsel must walk a fine line to avoid including language that could be interpreted as impeding potential whistleblowers.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

The SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower’s top priority going into 2016 will be to assess company confidentiality agreements for compliance with Rule 21-F-17(a). Rule 21F-17(a) provides that no person may take any action to impede an individual from reporting information about wrongdoing to the SEC. The OWB’s primary focus in enforcing Rule 21-F-17(a) has been to discourage companies from enforcing or threatening to enforce confidentiality agreements that prohibit employees from discussing the substance of interviews they gave in internal investigations without the approval of the company's legal department.

We previously reported on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s efforts to crack down on anti-whistleblower agreements earlier this year. At that time, the SEC brought charges and accepted payment of a penalty related to a company’s anti-whistleblower confidentiality agreements. It is clear from the OWB’s 2015 Annual Report that the SEC will be prioritizing

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from