Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 NOVEMBER 2013

Reverse Triangular Mergers Are Not Assignments

Fox Rothschild LLP
Fox Rothschild LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Fox Rothschild LLP

A reverse triangular merger was not an assignment by operation of law.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

A reverse triangular merger was not an assignment by operation of law.  See Meso Scale Diagnostics LLC v. Roche Diagostics GMBH, Del. Ch., C.A. No. 5589-VCP, 2/22/13, http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/CONF_ORD_Meso_Scale_Diagnostics_LLC_vs_Roche_Diagnostics_GmbH_Do.

The court explained that a company entered into a series of contemporaneously executed agreements that granted it a new non-exclusive license. However, before the transaction was complete the licensor, transferred all of its intellectual property assets, subject to outstanding licensee rights, to a newly created corporation.  These were then acquired in a reverse triangular merger where the new company was the surviving entity.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from