Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JUNE 2018

Religious Institutions Update: June 2018

Since 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court has expressly construed a neutral law of general applicability as consistent with the free exercise clause.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Mr. Nathan A Adams IV is a partner in Holland & Knight's Chicago office

Mr. Peter M Friedman is a practice group leader in Holland & Knight's Chicago office

Timely Topics

Since 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court has expressly construed a neutral law of general applicability as consistent with the free exercise clause. Deeming Colorado's public accommodations law just such a law, the Colorado Court of Appeals upheld the law's application in 2015 to a bakery and its owner who would not create a wedding cake for a same-sex wedding because, as a Christian, the owner believed he would displease God. The Colorado court affirmed a cease and desist order requiring the bakery to take remedial measures, but the bakery appealed. Before 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court applied the so-called compelling interest test to infringements upon the sincere religious exercise of individuals. In those cases, it did not matter how neutral or generally applicable was the infringing law; the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from